Traffic measurements Video

From TD-er's Wiki
Revision as of 18:00, 20 February 2007 by Rubzzzz (talk | contribs) (→‎Conclusions)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Voice and video analysis

Experimental Setup

Schematic overview of the test-setup. The colors in the sketch match the colors in the following Ethereal-screenshots

In words the configuration is the following: SIP phone #1 is connected to Asterisk #1 and SIP phone #2 is connected to Asterisk #2. The SIP phones are not directly connected to each other but can communicate with each other because Asterisk #1 is directly connected to Asterisk #2 (and vica versa).

Arrows represent possible data traffic that will be measured (see results).

Codec used: ?

Results

In the screenshot below, the following holds:

  • @4 sec: Video was turned on
  • @14 sec: Video was set to black (connection lost with DVdriver)
  • @20 sec: Video showed moving pictures again.

Ethereal graph voice and one-way-video.png

In the screenshot below, the conversation included audio and video until t = 35s. After t = 35s, the traffic is audio-only. Ethereal graph voice and one-way-video2.png

Legenda:

  • Black: traffic from and to Trixbox #1
  • Red: traffic between the 2 Windows machines running X-lite
  • Green: traffic between laptop #1 and its Asterisk
  • Blue: traffic between the two Asterisk PBX's
  • Pink: traffic between Windows machine #1 and its Asterisk

Conclusions

  • First of all, there can be seen from the screenshots shown above that the red line can be represented by (y=0). Because the red line represents the traffic between the 2 Windows machines running X-lite we can conclude that there is no direct traffic between the X-Lites.
  • Secondly, there can be seen from the second screenshot that the black, green, blue and pink line represent all the same amount of data traffic. From this there can be concluded that the traffic between the Trixboxes is the same as the triffic to and from the Trixboxes, i.e. the traffic is not limited between the Trixboxes.
  • Conclusie over codec gebruikt/wel of niet overeenkomen met verwachte bandwidth usage.

Differences between voice and video

Experimental Setup

Two SIP phones are connected to the same Asterisk PBX Trixbox. One SIP phone is equiped with a camera while the other is not. The bandwidth usage is measured between the Trixbox and the SIP phones connected to it.

Results

Data is collected using WireShark and the data is stored here: (captured Ethereal data)

Ethereal graph showing the differences in traffic between audio and video (resp. g711u and H263-1998 codec). Black: from SIP-phone #1 to PBX. Blue: from SIP-phone #2 to PBX Pink: all traffic between SIP-phone #1 and the PBX

Legenda:

  • Black shows audio & video from SIP-phone #1 to the PBX (video starting at the 10th second)
  • Blue shows audio-only from SIP-phone #2 to the PBX
  • Pink shows all traffic between SIP-phone #1 and the PBX (both directions)


  • The debug-screen
    X-lite debug-screen
    of X-lite (Ctrl + F9) told us the SIP-phone assumed a total available bandwith of 256/256 kbps. This was filled with 64 kbps for speech (protocol g711u) and 131 kbps for video (protocol H263-1998).
  • When looking at the speech traffic:
    • 50 packets/sec (measured with Ethereal)
    • 214 Bytes/packet (measured with Ethereal)
    • +/- 10,7 kByte/s
    • 160 bytes audio-data per packet (64 kbps = 8000 Bytes/sec, 50 packets/sec)
    • UDP-packet-header: 28 Bytes.
  • Measured IAX-overhead: (the g711u codec uses a CBR of 64kbps) 214 - 28 - 160 = 26 Bytes/packet. Thus 1300 Bytes/sec IAX overhead (10k4 bps).

Conclusions

  • Hier iets over verwachte bandwitdh aangaande codec.